Archive for the ‘Access’ Category

Australia & Denmark: An analogy?

The recent Australian elections resulted in a tight win by the Labour party. Presumably Labor had to cut a deal with the 2 rural independent MPs to form a Government. This deal provided (according to reports from the down under) that NBN will start deployments in rural areas with metropolitan centers following later. This is a surprising and unexpected development for many and has created criticism by the opposition [1].

However, this prospect brings to mind a country where FTTH market started developing inwards, i.e. from rural areas to urban centers: Denmark. The country’s miraculous FTTH take up is credited mainly to utilities’ deployments of FTTH access networks. In fact, FTTH market in Denmark has been dominated by utilities (although TDC came strong to the fore last year). What is important in the given context is that rural electric utilities (owned by consumer cooperatives) consider fiber access as a public good (similar to electric supply) and as such they deploy FTTH to everyone who is asking for it, with 400k rural households already having coverage.

The Danes I know often say that it is easier to get FTTH in the countryside rather in Copenhagen!

share save 171 16 Australia & Denmark: An analogy?

Light my Fibre: Ribarroja de Ebro / Spain

Ribarroja de Ebro (Riba-roja d’Ebre) is a tiny village in the northeastern Spain that have started its own FTTH project to cover a population of 1350 inhabitants (estimated penetration: 50%), with a budget totalling 200k euros. I think the case is very interesting due to the small size of the FTTH network and its implications to the business case.

In the area, Telefónica offers 1Mbps and the network plans for 10Mbps symmetrical speeds at a monthly fee of 35 euros. Another 18 euros will required from end-users to bundle access with municipal telephony and IPTV services, although the network will offer open access to all interested operators. It is based on a Point-To-Multipoint architecture with effective ration of 1:64 (two aggregation points of 1:8).

Carlos Bock, fellow blogger is involved in the project, if you want someone to talk to! There are also some information available at bandaancha.eu.

share save 171 16 Light my Fibre: Ribarroja de Ebro / Spain

NBN decides Australian Government

Broadband has been increasingly influential to political life and political decision-making across the globe. This is no secret. A number of municipalities and city councils in USA campaigned, some of them far from conservatively, to attract Google’s attention for an FTTH pilot. City officials in Europe and US include broadband related issues in their political campaigns and operational programs, the Swiss are asked to vote for or against the roll-out of NGA networks before the city councils commit to the projects, etc.

However, recent Australian elections with the consecutive 17 days of limbo-swinging for power, seems to have outweighed all past cases. Labor Government remains in power and preserves a fragile (76-74) minority government with national broadband plan appear as the deciding factors.  Tony Windsor, one of the independent MPs backing up of Labor confirmed that “The issues that [...] were critical to this [backing up the labor Government], and possibly the most critical, was broadband“.

That’s not all. According to The Sydney Morning Herald, Greens are most likely going to remove ISP network filtering from the original Labor’s national broadband plan.

Don’t think that you are living the dream, because you are. Australians are about to get their fiber with no packet filtering whatsoever.

I really look forward to see what comes next!

[Update] Read also this:  NBN a key factor in decision: independents

share save 171 16 NBN decides Australian Government

New Zealand’s Broadband Map

I have been meaning to write about that for a while, and have always postponed.

In http://www.broadbandmap.govt.nz/map/ there is a  map that gather data available from various sources to provide information about the demand and supply of broadband infrastructure across New Zealand. The first instance of the map has been online since 2007 and has been revised after consultation with users and potential users. It provides an overall view of broadband in New Zealand, making easier for Government to engage in aggregation of demand and for any interested party to check on the broadband coverage of each operator in the country. So if you want to know about broadband in New Zealand this is a nice place to start.

The National Broadband Map has been developed and is managed by the Ministry of Economic Development.

share save 171 16 New Zealands Broadband Map

Swiss Competition Commission investigates EWZ-Swisscom FTTH Deal

Weko (the Swiss competition committee) was asked to investigate the terms and conditions of EWZ-Swisscom deal for FTTH deployment. The deal is challenged on the premises of the exclusive rights given to Swisscom for the use of one fiber strand per home passed. The major issue is whether exclusive rights are justified by  Swisscom’s participation in the project (i.e. does Swisscom investment in the project justifies the exclusive use of a fiber strand?).

To make things more interesting, Routerless, an FTTB+ADSL provider in Zurich asked Weko if EWZ has the right to refuse an FTTB connection (note: EWZ is planning to build an FTTH network).

Background Info: Swiss utilities are planning for FTTH roll-outs in collaboration with Swisscom. Zurich, Bern, among other cities invest via their energy utilities in FTTH and get Swisscom on board by negotiating the use of one (or more in some cases) fiber by the incumbent. The utilities deploy additional fiber for future use by other operators. This model (this form of collaboration between utilities and the incumbent) is unique in Europe.

share save 171 16 Swiss Competition Commission investigates EWZ Swisscom FTTH Deal

National Broadband Networks: Break off on L1 or L2?

The purpose of this post is to put a few observations regarding the services options available to public planners of NGA infrastructures; for future reference. This is only a draft on benefits and risks for public offerings on Layer 1 and Layer 2 services.

National broadband plans (i.e. nationwide NGA infrastructures) concentrate primarily in building an access infrastructure and serving the wholesale markets. This is a business option widely adopted  to allow private innovation and competition in the services layer (which carries the greatest value for broadband). Responsibilities, services and prices are regulated and usually contractually agreed.

The fundamental drawback of similar national plans is that the success of the wholesaler (the operator who runs the network for the Government) depends on the success of the retailers market, and provided the current development level of high-speed broadband market, interest by access operators in the infrastructure is not guaranteed. This is a major risk.

State interventions aim usually at Layer 1 products (i.e. dark fiber & unbundled fiber) for access providers as a base model. Luckily, L1 services offer the widest possibilities for telecoms operators for business flexibility and innovation potential.

However, L1 offerings are not immediately connected with retail, thus ISPs have to invest in Layer 2, something that may delay access sales and penetration rates. This is a crucial point for business sustainability. The infrastructure operator needs buyers for his products and the buyers are mainly interested in Layer 3. So there is a gap in L2 that needs closing. There are two options for that:

  • Contract a Communications operator: Communications Operators offer L2 products (capacity / connection services) across the infrastructure. The prices of L2 offerings are also regulated. Communications operators are provided with the option to offer L3 services (retail) as well, however with a form of functional separation between layers 2 and 3.
  • Integrate to L2: The infrastructure operator sells L2 products along with its L1 offerings. The infrastructure operator is structurally separated between L2 and L3 and functionally separated between L1 and L2. L2 is more attractive profit-wise for the infrastructure operator and a price relation between L1 unbundling and L2 wholesaling has to be put in place.

Simultaneously, passive infrastructure can be made available to other businesses (not only telecoms operators), e.g. large organizations, public services, education and health institutions, mobile carriers. Dark fiber is offered to this type of customers as a point-to-point connection between two premises (looped at the CO), and generally require sufficient IT staff for using the dark fiber connection. This however, is not well received by incumbents since it directly competes with their wholesale products.

share save 171 16 National Broadband Networks: Break off on L1 or L2?

FTTB in Volga, Russia

rusia 150x150 FTTB in Volga, RussiaRussian regional operator VolgaTelecom has launched fibre-to-the-building (FTTB) broadband services in Ulyanovsk and Dmitrovgrad. Services are being provided under its J-internet brand.

The operator has launched 16,000 ports in the two cities, offering download speeds of up to 100Mbps.

TeleGeography reports.

share save 171 16 FTTB in Volga, Russia

Thailand considers the FTTH Open Access model

thailand Thailand considers the FTTH Open Access modelThailand swings with the idea of investing in FTTH infrastructure on Open Access principles. Alcatel-Lucent presented to Thailand’s Minister of ICT the case of a passive (unbundler/wholesaler) operator on the footmarks of Singapore and the plans of Australia.

Thailand has 63.52million population and 19 million households. Despite the ICT  intensity of the national economy there are only 3.03million Internet users. And, only 2.29million are using high-speed Internet services.

In the current economic context with the financial crisis not yet clearly behind us, Government assistance to construct open infrastructures gains traction among nations.

If you want to read the whole story, visit ‘One Fiber – One Family’: FTTx Network Model for Thailand.

share save 171 16 Thailand considers the FTTH Open Access model

This is only a telephone line…

A hilarious ad by HKBN about the Next-Generation Internet. It features Graham Bell speaking Cantonese!

share save 171 16 This is only a telephone line...

Applications over FTTH

The FTTH Council released a new video on FTTH uses and applications that simply rocks! Clink this link or watch it below in case you are still wondering what applications may justify an FTTH rollout!

share save 171 16 Applications over FTTH
Page 3 of 712345...Last »