Posts Tagged ‘Policy’

Infrastructure-based Competition in NGA: The Best Way Forward?

 Infrastructure based Competition in NGA: The Best Way Forward?

According to EC’s recommendation, member states have to encourage infrastructure-based competition as the best and fastest way for broadband development [1]. At first, the arguments behind infrastructure-based competition policies seem solid. Competition does good to the market: provides efficiency incentives to operators, reduces prices, increase penetration, etc. This seems to cheer everyone: 1) Customers are happy for receiving cheaper service, 2) incumbents are happy because alternative networks start spending money in infrastructure, and gradually stop cherry picking over their infrastructure, 3) operators see higher penetration rates as a way to increase their market potential and revenue streams. In all this ideal setting, regulators’ overall efficiency, as measured by EC, increases.

However, broadband development and infrastructure-based competition come with some significant costs. Social benefits from higher broadband penetration (stemming from infrastructure competition) are offset by a) operation inefficiencies of duplicating/redundant infrastructures and b) the cost of laying out these infrastructures.

So, here’s the billion dollars question: Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Does network competition truely advances the market (and at what extent) or do competitors simply eat out each other’s profits. Infrastructure competition can lead to price wars (when you compete at the conduit level, what else there is to compete over) which then makes the business case of the networks worse. Intuitely, this means that only those with the deeper pockets are going to survive. International experience provides the evidence: Telco’s bankruptcies and consolidations imply that indeed firms’ benefits (producer surplus) is negative.

For that, telcos seem to initially choose unserved geographical markets to deploy their networks and avoid direct competition, as Benoit points out , but this will not necessarily last for ever .

Thus, we are faced with a serious potential deficit: Socially sub-optimal over-spending in duplicating, parallel infrastructures. Would it be possible that infrastructure-based competition does not serve social welfare in the long-run? Should we look beyond short-term gains of increased broadband penetration?

Maybe, it should be worth revisiting the current policies aiming at quick broadband penetration, especially in these times where huge piles of money are being prepared to be invested in physical infrastructure. Public, publicly-owned or public-private physical infrastructure operated under open access rules is a serious alternative to the current policy guidelines and it must be re-assessed by regional/national regulators.

[1] EC also suggests that in the regions that experience a market failure the Government must intervene and subsidize, finance and/or facilitate physical infrastructure on some sort of public ownership terms (wtih the aid of EU funds). The three most evident examples of EU funding in regional/municipal physical infrastructures are Sweden’s in the late 90′s early 00′s, Ireland’s in 2003-2006 and Greece’s in the period 2005-2008. In all three cases, municipal metro networks were built and FTTB connections to public buildings (education, health, public administration etc) were constructed.

share save 171 16 Infrastructure based Competition in NGA: The Best Way Forward?

French Regulator Releases FTTH Last Mile Deployment Guidelines

arcep1 French Regulator Releases FTTH Last Mile Deployment GuidelinesARCEP has recently released the outcome of the public consultation on FTTH last mile deployment guidelines. In a statement Friday, Arcep said it recommends the first operator “to equip a building offers to install additional fiber” in the last part of the network “on behalf of other operators”. Read below the press release. You can download the recommendation, in English, by clicking here.

Paris, 10 October 2008

To ensure that fibre rollouts take place under satisfactory competition conditions, following a public consultation with the players, ARCEP is publishing its preliminary recommendations, pursuant to the adoption of the Law on modernising the economy. ARCEP recommends the establishment of sharing of the last part agreements that include all operators, and which make it possible to test the different solutions in several large metropolitan areas. As an adjunct, ARCEP recommends a best practice whereby the building operator would offer to install additional last drop fibre on behalf of third-party operators. ARCEP has also published a sample agreement allowing joint property owners and social landlords to contract an operator to manage the fibre installation inside the premises.

The deployment of a new fibre local loop is a major technical, economic and competition challenge for our country. It represents a long-term investment over great many years and billions of euros, much as the deployment of the copper network did. As revealed in the responses to the public consultation, there are still a number of uncertainties concerning investment and operating costs, operational constraints and technological choices. These uncertainties are further accentuated by the inherent complexities of deploying a new local loop, in cooperation with competing operators.

Over the past 18 months, the Authority has led a series of technical and economic efforts aimed at establishing a framework that encourages investment in optical fibre local loops, while promoting a situation of lasting competition. A portion of these efforts have already entered the operational stage, while certain principles still need to be examined with respect to other issues. The public consultation launched before the summer, on the issue of sharing of the last part, helped deepen existing analyses. Through the elements being made public today, the Authority hopes that the first rollouts can be carried out with adherence to the principles of fair competition and technological neutrality.

Access to France Telecom ducts

On 15 September 2008, France Telecom published a reference offer for access to its civil infrastructure. This publication satisfies the obligation contained in the market analysis decision adopted by the Authority on 24 July of this year, which requires France Telecom to provide access to its civil infrastructure (ducts, manholes) under transparent and non-discriminatory conditions, and at cost-oriented tariffs.

The technical work and trials which began in autumn 2007 made it possible to create an operational offer, and confirmed a satisfactory level of available civil infrastructure. All operators, regardless of the technology they use, can now employ France Telecom ducts to deploy fibre.

Mutualising the last drop

The Law on modernising the economy, of 4 August 2008, introduces a principle of shared access to guarantee competition in the ultra-fast broadband market, without increasing the number of parties involved in installations on private property. The first operator to install fibre on the premises must thus satisfy all reasonable demands for access to the last drop of the network from third-party operators.

The implementation of this obligation encompasses several dimensions: methods for performing work on the premises, location of a shared access point, technical choices for the sharing of the last part process, informing third-party operators, etc. These are new issues to which the players are proposing a variety of solutions, and on which feedback from players with actual experience is still scarce.

For the launch stage, the Authority is in favour of allowing the players to find solutions, based on the recommendations being published today. The first agreements have already been signed, and still more will be required before all operators can begin their rollouts. The goal is to test the different solutions in several large metropolitan areas, in other words on a sufficiently large scale to obtain relevant results without undermining the subsequent stages.

In its recommendations, ARCEP supports a process whereby the first operator to equip a building offers to install additional fibre in the last drop on behalf of other operators. When applicable, this option would act as a complement to the other sharing of the last part solutions planned by the operators, and would be pre-financed by the interested parties. Because of the limited additional cost involved, and its compatibility with the technical choices of all operators, this constitutes a future-proof best practice.

Publication of a sample agreement

The Law stipulates that the installation of fibre be governed by an agreement between the building operator and the owner or manager of the property.

Thanks to the feedback obtained during the public consultation, the Authority is able to publish a sample agreement that satisfies the demands expressed by the players. This document includes the essential guarantees for property owners, while limiting the administrative burden on operators. It makes it possible to provide property owners and operators with a reference contractual framework that adheres to the principles set out in the Law. Players can already use the sample agreement.

The next stages

Technical work continues to be performed with the players on all of these issues, in an endeavour to fine-tune the principles to be applied to pioneer rollouts, and to prepare for subsequent stages based on actual experience. The Authority will also take full account of the recommendation on new access networks which is currently being drafted by the European Commission.

Before the end of the year, ARCEP will publish an ultra-fast broadband roadmap to track the progress being made by rollouts and sharing of the last part mechanisms, and the use of France Telecom ducts.

The Authority will be particularly vigilant to ensure that no single operator enjoys unjustified advantages in fibre rollouts, whether in terms of progress in their deployments, the capacity to lay fibre in civil infrastructure or access to premises and customers. The possibility for all operators to deploy fibre to the subscriber indeed provides the strongest incentive to invest in ultra-fast broadband, and the greatest guarantees in terms of competition and innovation.

share save 171 16 French Regulator Releases FTTH Last Mile Deployment Guidelines

3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services” – Part E

Day 2 – Session 3: Innovation in Services

Andreas Anastasopoulos, President of Greek Licensed Telecommunication Providers Association (SATPE) discussed the opportunities and challenges of Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs). He argued that MVNOs is the next best thing for service innovation in the telecommunications industry. The core argument behind that is that services and products differentiation can retain customer base (of fixed-line operators). Market and prices comparisons were made amongst various European markets and the Greek market indicating the lack of competition in this field in Greece and the negative impact on services prices. He concluded that regulatory enforcement of MVNO business is obligatory for new innovative services development. He also sees a unique business opportunity for fixed operators to enter the MVNO market.

[I agree that enhanced service competition is required in the mobile market. But I don’t agree with the proposed strategy for fixed-line operators. Mobile services offerings might present in some respects a business opportunity for fixed-line operators, but this strategy totally neglects the key competitive advantage for fixed-line operators which is the enormous bandwidth they can offer to end-users, that Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) don’t have and probably never will. Besides, this is the reason why MNOs are starting to horizontally integrate via various forms of partnerships (mergers, coordinated marketing efforts, network leases etc) with fixed operators through out the world.]

Read more

share save 171 16 3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services”   Part E

3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services” – Part D

Day 2 – Session 2: Innovation in Networks: Next Generation Access Networks

Nicolas Curien, member of the Board of ARCEP gave interesting insight to ARCEP’s future regulation priorities regarding NGANs. If I got this straight, ARCEP is currently analyzing the French market to evaluate the best type of regulation for allowing access to the FT’s ducts (civil engineering). Another important issue is the form of access & entry of fiber/operators to the buildings (fears of monopolizing access to the buildings by the first entrant are expressed).

French are separating copper/traditional network and fiber networks. This is evident on the regulation approach followed regarding these networks. They are working on an asymmetric regulation regime for FT’s ducts (inherited from the traditional monopoly) and on a symmetric regulation regime for ALL operators that are building fiber access (the last mile).

Read more

share save 171 16 3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services”   Part D

3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services” – Part C

Day 2 – Innovative Applications of Broadband Internet

Session 1: Innovative Regulatory Measures for Competition and Broadband Market

The session discussed Functional & Structural Separation from many perspectives. The speakers common conclusion was that Functional/Structural separation may be attractive but it is not an a-priori straight-forward solution to the problem of NGA investment encouragement and competition promotion.

Read more

share save 171 16 3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services”   Part C

3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services” – Part B

Day 1 – Session 2: Regulatory Challenges for Broadband Innovation

Chris Fonteijn, president of OPTA and member of the board of the ERG presented the Dutch situation as an effective (impressive) broadband duopoly:

  • 94% households are served by cable
  • 99% households are served by KPN
  • 50%-70% of households are served by alternative operators

The Dutch regulation process has been tailored on infrastructure competition with LLU being the core building block since 1997. Today OPTA is shifting regulation efforts to less broadband access regulation, focusing only to high quality wholesale broadband access. In concluding the key NGA issues for the future, according to OPTA, are:

  • Future of infrastructure competition (is duopoly enough?, smooth transition from copper to fiber)
  • Market consolidation (future market structure)
  • Convergence and bundling (How NGA affects other markets?)
  • End-user interests (Freedom/ease of choice, lock-in problems, customer service, universal service)

Read more

share save 171 16 3rd International Conference of EETT “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services”   Part B

3rd International Conference of EETT "Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services" – Part A

This weekend I followed the 3rd Annual Conference for Broadband Internet organized by EETT. This year, the conference’s theme was on “Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services”. Although I planned to participate in the conference last minute emergencies have prevented me from going.

Luckily, this has not proven much of a problem. EETT has arranged a webcast service for the conference via their website. It was the first time that EETT’s annual conference was being webcasted and proved indeed very helpful for me. Mdata, the company responsible for the webcast service did a pretty decent job. On the downside though, the slideshow didn’t work on Sunday. That made it a little more difficult to follow on the presentations of the day.

Nevertheless, I enjoyed the comfort of my home office, having a coffee and drafting notes (and playing with my baby girl during the breaks!). I think I kinda liked it better that way.

I’ve missed most of the first part of day 1. Here, you can find a summary of the first part of the first day published at EETT’s web site. Here’s the same info in English with the help of the google translator (use it at your own risk!).

However, a tension in relationships between EETT’s president and the OTE’s CEO had made the headlines (And it was not the first time).

Prof. Nikitas Alexandrides, EETT president made a negative remark regarding OTE’s cooperation in the regulation process and expressed his hopes that the forthcoming acquisition of OTE’s management by DT will change things and make OTE a better cooperator in the telecommunication regulation process of the country.

OTE’s CEO Panagis Vourloumis responded to this by leaving the conference room explaining that this was an improper remark for himself and the organization. All top management of OTE group followed their CEO outside the room… (Many say that DT has worse relationships with the German regulator than has OTE with EETT – I leave you to draw your own conclusions!)

The rest of the conference was much more interesting… See following posts.

share save 171 16 3rd International Conference of EETT "Innovation in Broadband Networks & Services"   Part A

1st Open Meeting of Ebusiness Forum Id3 Workgroup on FTTx

On the 29th of May the 1st open meeting of Ebusiness forum Id3 Workgroup on FTTx was held at the President Hotel, Athens. 35-40 representatives of public & private sector came to the meeting which was, I think, a great success in participation terms. Group members are approximately 50, therefore, a participation figure close to 80% is encouraging.

Interesting thoughts have been shared during the meeting. Most of the major players (OTE, EETT, SATPE, municipalities consultants, all major construction companies etc.) of the telecommunications market expressed their views on the consultation issues. Nevertheless, we are expecting a more formal response to the consultation text [check previous post] by the end of June in order to incorporate with no exceptions and no misunderstandings all views to the final deliverable.

A final note: I was planning to write a brief on the meeting, however, the delegate from adslgr.com have already taken care of that! Please have a look at this forum thread. It’s very informative and close to what I would have done, whatsoever. A remarkable work Alex!

share save 171 16 1st Open Meeting of Ebusiness Forum Id3 Workgroup on FTTx

European Commission’s Public Consultation on “ICTs enabling energy efficiency”

Excerpts from the public consultation text follows:

At the 2007 Spring European Council, the Heads of State and Government highlighted the development of a sustainable integrated European climate and energy policy as a top priority and adopted an energy and climate package to guide the EU towards a competitive and secure energy economy while promoting energy savings and climate-friendly energy sources. The package defined three targets for 2020: 20% reduction in emissions compared to 1990 levels; 20% share of renewable energies in the overall EU energy consumption; and 20% savings in EU energy consumption compared to projections.

This policy will bring about alternative ways of running our daily lives so that Europe can continue on the path of growth and jobs while leading the global effort to tackle climate change and energy efficiency.

The importance of ICT (Information and Communication Technologies) as a driver of growth and productivity is widely recognised. In contrast, the considerable impact of ICT on improving energy efficiency across the economy (i.e., energy productivity growth), as well as in improving efficiency in the use of natural resources whilst reducing pollution and dangerous waste, needs to be made more visible. This enabling role of ICT in improving energy efficiency, cutting across the whole economy, is the focus of the Commission communication on “Addressing the challenge of energy efficiency through Information and Communication Technologies” adopted on 13th May 2008.

The purpose of this consultation is to gather information and opinions from stakeholders on which are the sectors that offer the most promising prospects for improved energy efficiency through the use of ICT and what are the actions to be taken at EU level in order to maximise these effects. The results of the consultation will provide input for a second Communication defining a concrete policy approach.

Given the nature of the consultation, the publication of individual replies is not envisaged at this stage. A (partial) publication may, however, be considered if of interest to all stakeholders. This is why respondents are requested to clearly state whether they would agree to their contribution being published.

All contributions will be carefully analysed and a summary of the outcome of the consultation will be published on DG INFSO’s website http://ec.europa.eu/ictforsg

Contact: European Commission, DG INFSO, Unit H4 “ICT for Sustainable Growth”
E-mail: INFSO-ICTforSG@ec.europa.eu

Public Consultation Page: http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=ICT4EE

share save 171 16 European Commissions Public Consultation on ICTs enabling energy efficiency

National Strategy for Electronic Communications industry in Greece – Open Consultation

Earlier this week, the preliminary results of Ministry of Communications & Transport taskforce for the strategy for Electronic Communications industry in Greece were released. All stakeholders are invited to comment and opinion on the preliminary results. The consultation ends on Friday the 6th of June.

The consultation’s documents can be found from the links below:

Preliminary results on development of strategy for Electronic Communications industry in Greece

Questions for consultation

Strategy for Electronic Communications & New Technologies 2007-2013 – Ministry of Communications & Transport

share save 171 16 National Strategy for Electronic Communications industry in Greece   Open Consultation
Page 2 of 41234