Archive for the ‘Reviews’ Category

Greece’s Telecom Market: A Reality Check (Part III)

 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (Part III)

This is the third and last part of the brief market review I started a couple of weeks ago. The first part presented the case of the operators that didn’t handle the heat and were eventually thrown out of the market. In part II I provided some insight on the plans of the existing players and how these plans are currently drafted. In this final part I will discuss the entry of a newcomer in the broadband market of Greece and will summarize with some overall personal conclusions about the market.

CYTA (Cyprus Telecommunications Authority) is the Cypriot incumbent. Contrary to his Greek counterpart, CYTA has already deployed PON in selected places in Cyprus and is currently evaluating implementation and operation issues of FTTH. Their experience has shown, according to company officials, that the cost difference between PON and P2P is not dramatic and that both technologies may be considered by an operator for large scale deployments on a case by case basis.

The company has recently established a local branchCYTA Hellas to initiate the group’s businesses in the Greek market. The major breakthrough for CYTA Hellas was the award of one of the deployment zones (this of Western Macedonia) of Call 157 (EU funded InfoSoc Programm). Call 157 is a major broadband supply stimulation initiative of this administration and involves the provision of a minimum guaranteed quality broadband services to all cities and villages over 500 citizens. CYTA Hellas and the rest of the winners of other deployment zones benefited from the project and deployed backhaul infrastructure (comprised of both fiber and wireless technologies) to meet the tender requirements.

On the 20th of October, in a special event, CYTA Hellas announced that is starting its retail business in Greece. Currently CYTA can offer services only in Western Macedonia via its own broadband network. A major issue for the company is how it will enter the market of the metropolitan areas of Athens and Thessaloniki as at the moment it does not have operational network in place. Moreover, initial saturation of the DSL market is signalled by the slow down of take up rates. Coming lately to the scene, CYTA Hellas will have to decide if it is going to build from scratch its network or if it is going to acquire existing networks. Based on the company’s past record, CYTA has the capacity to succeed in the market and the recent turmoil (both in domestic telecom industry and in the international financial system) might point to a series of acquisitions as the best way to accomplish its goals. This strategy will certainly release much of the pressure accumulated in the industry and will promote the formation of the fourth significant group in the market. From where I stand, grouping some of the remaining operators under CYTA Hellas mothership will signify positive developments for the company, the acquired firms and the market overall.

In conclusion

 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (Part III)

For the last seven years, the telecommunications industry in Greece has been the battlefield of fiercly competing operators. Conventional thinking suggests that too many operators entered the market in the first years of liberalization resulting in a great wealth of choices for the consumers. At the same time however, it proved difficult for any of them to reach a critical mass that would enable a quick move forward. OTE was accused for delaying commissioning and wholesale support for the first years of liberalization (both in transit telephony and local loop unbundling services). Even though he was fined by EETT for various of its practices it eventually managed to catch up with its competitors and compete succefully as soon as he had its operational processes prepared.

Recent bankcruptcies prove that the market was infact too small for the vast interest shown by investors. The recent outcomes also proved that in telecommunications true service differentiation is required in order to survive. Infact, neither of the companies that didn’t make it did well on unbundling. Moreover, the inhability of the alternative operators to differentiate in product mix resulted in price wars that only made the situation worse.

OTE has announced the Reference Unbundling Offer (RUO) in 2001 but it was effectively put in action late 2003 early 2004. This delay had a major negative impact for the operators that were prepared early for unbundling business. These operators eventually sat on an infrastructure without being able to do much with it. It is worth mentioning that after the effective application of RUO the overal broadband diffusion increased dramatically. EETT & OTE have both been blaimed for the delayed negotiations regarding the 2nd RUO which was announced a few months back and is addressing several loose ends of the 1st RUO. Effective unbundling in Greece started at least 5 years later than in other European countries and we are still at least 5 years behind.

Also, in my view, year 2008 marked a significant change in EETT’s response towards operator disputes. This summer EETT didn’t try to settle things down between disputing operators, instead it stated that “No one expects from OTE to be a telecommunications bank“. If you belong to those who thought/think that EETT favoured/tolerated alternative operators over OTE this definately sounds like: “From here on, you’re on your own!

Today, the market is making a significant turn. Recent information (released by OTE) reveils a significant shift of subscribers back to the arms of the incumbent. It seems that competition did not manage to keep customers with reduced prices due to lower quality offerings. What’s important, quality is not only about high speeds rather about customer service, technical response & competence etc. And OTE, although is still suffering from his inherent incumbent’s syndroms, seems to have a lead in this compared to his competitors. This customer shift is underpinned by the strong uncertainty in the market as to which operator is financially secure and have a sustainable business model to support customer’s business operation in the long-term.

My take is that the era of spontaneity and grace is over and the game will be played not on the price premises rather on service quality and innovation. Still though, the game is exciting with great prospects for those who play it wisely!

share save 171 16 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (Part III)

Greece’s Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part II)

 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part II)

In a previous post I briefly reviewed on the most important players that didn’t make it in Greece’s telecommunications market. In this post I will present some of the most exciting developments for the players that are still in the game, how their strategies are shaped and what future actions are anticipated. Although many analysts forecast that no more than 3 or 4 players will stay in the market (a projection underpinned by the market structure in mobile sector) we witness an increased activity by all remaining players summoning resources and redesigning their operational and firm structures for the next days. However, 3 major groups are starting to form. It remains to be seen how the rest of the competition will react and how the anticipated market concentration will resolve.

Three Major Groups are Forming…

OTE , the national incumbent has been aggregating all of the organization’s activities to an umbrella group for some time now. OTE Group today is comprised of OTE (fixed telephony and physical infrastructure), Otenet (Internet services), VoiceNet (IP telephony), Cosmote (3G mobile operator), OTEGlobe (international capacity wholesaler) and other smaller primarily consulting units of the mother company. OTE is also operating OTEShops , a retail chain of 125 stores. However, after the acquisition of Germanos, a very successful telephony retail chain with 425 stores nationwide, the group is planning on shutting down OTEShops. According to the Group’s announcement OTEShops contribute only 3% of the Group’s total sales and their operation is duplicating with the successful Germanos chain. Last week, Deutsche Telecom has finalized the acquisition of a 25%+1 share of the company. Now, DT and the Greek government control 50%+2 of the organization. According to the agreement between DT and the Greek government, DT is expected to take operational control of OTE in January.

Vodafone , is the second largest mobile operator (32.04% market share) in the country after Cosmote (40% market share). Since mid-2007 the company has implemented a partnership agreement with Hellas Online (HOL) to offer fixed broadband services using HOL’s private telecommunications network. HOL’s broadband services under the Vodafone brand proved remarkably successful. This alignment is expected by many analysts to create the second competitive pole in telecommunications market in the country. HOL is 100% owned by Intracom Holdings since early 2006 when Eurobank sold the company to its new owner. HOL is a public company since July 2008 through its merge with Unibrain (which was already been traded in stock exchange market). HOL operates an extensive fibre (backhaul & access) network. According to the company’s recently released data HOL has invested 152ml euros in infrastructure and the network’s length is 3500Km. HOL has installed equipment (physical collocation) in 152 of OTE’s central offices (CO) and is offering services through its telecommunications network to 84 cities in 44 out of 52 prefectures of the country. These numbers make HOL’s network the second largest in the country in terms of population coverage. HOL comes third in LLU market with 91,000 subscribers. HOL expects for a positive EBIDTA for 2009.

Wind , is the third largest mobile operator (27.96% market share) in the country. Last year, the company acquired Q Telecom, the fourth mobile operator in the country, which targeted price sensitive consumer market. It has also acquired Tellas , one of the major fixed operators in the country that accounts for 150,000 LLU connections out of approx. 555,000 connections in total. The acquisition of Tellas is estimated to complete by 31/12/2008. Wind has in total more than 400 sales points that serve both Wind and Tellas customers and gives to the group a significant competitive advantage. They are both indirectly controlled by the ambitious Orascom Group . The synergies already in place provide the opportunity for bundled offers and direct competition with OTE Group and Vodafone-HOL offerings. Lately, an agreement on commercial level has been made public between Marfin Investment Group (MIG) and Wind Group that aims at facilitating bundled or combined offers between the telecommunications products of Tellas Group and the products of other firms controlled by MIG. MIG’s IT branch, Singular Logic is expected to develop wide cooperative activities with Wind Group. It is worth noting that MIG owned 20% of OTE which was sold to DT and enabled the German telco to negotiate the OTE package with the Greek government.

…and the Rest are Preparing for Battle (?)

 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part II)

Apparently, the rest of the competition will not give up easily. Why should they? Forthnet is is the oldest of all telecommunications operators and is currently in the first place of LLU market accounting for 177,000 connections. The company has made significant investments in physical infrastructure extending the network reach to the best part of OTE’s CO available for physical collocation. What marked the spot was this year’s acquisition of media companies NetMed N.V. and Intervision (Services) B.V, an investment that summed a little less than half a billion (0.5bn) euros. The market waits to see how NetMed offerings will be integrated with Forthnet’s telecommunications services. Forthnet has also aggressive plans to reach 100 points of sales by the end of 2008. Forthnet is the largest alternative fixed operator in the country and continues to widen their market share (although recently HOL catches up on new customers/month rates – unfortunately no indication is available on customer churn). The company is expecting a positive EBIDTA in the second semester of 2008. Forthnet is publicly traded in the Athens Stock Exchange (ASE).

On Telecoms came late in the market; however a huge marketing campaign helped the company achieve a significant market share in a very short time and today accounts for 90,000 LLU connections. The company is also planning to go public by merging with Zenon Group which is currently traded in ASE. A final note about the company’s plans is the announcement that a network redesign is in progress to enable the company to offer SLA services to business customers. There have been some rumours earlier this year that Forthnet and On Telecoms are planning for a merger but this was denied by the company’s executives.

Vivodi Telecoms is the first telecommunications operator that offered LLU services having in place its private network since 2003, far earlier than the rest of the competition. Vivodi has ever since been the pioneer in service offerings in many respects. The company was made known for its early start in new and innovative services (e.g. LLU, IP Telephony, IPTV, Quad Play). Despite moving quickly to new fields of services the company has never perform well in sales. Currently it accounts for 27,000 active LLU connections, ranking 5th in the market. Rumour has it that the company will “soon” be acquired by a major market player. The rumours are not denied by the company’s executives.

Last, NetOne and AlgoNet , two small telecom operators which have been active in the market for very long time have recently merged. Neither of them has ever considered being in the market’s front line. Details on the plans of the new company have not yet been released. It remains however interesting to see what these low profile operators are planning for the future. NetOne is controlled by Sciens Capital Management and BNP Paribas Private Equity, and Algonet by Olayan Group. According to latest info Olayan Group will hold 40% and each of the other two 30% of the newly founded company.

In the next and probably last part of this short analysis I intent to write about the coming of yet another operator in the Greek market and review the general characteristics, dynamics and potentials of the market. The question is…. “Will the advent of a newcomer release the market pressure or will it just poor more oil into the fire?”

UPDATE: Follow up the review in Part III.

share save 171 16 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part II)

Greece’s Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part I)

The Greek telecommunications market was liberated by EETT , the National Regulatory Authority in 2001 . Strong optimism on market’s prospects and the stock market prosperity of the time led many (far more than the local market could sustain) entrepreneurs to try their chances in telecommunications. Two years later, in 2003 the rumor had it that the time was up for the weaker (in a very subjective interpretation of the term) telecom operators to withdraw and clear the field for those with better business models and deeper pockets. And in fact, in 2003 three minor operators shutdown operations and anxiety for the next day inspired local press and marketing plans. Next year, the anticipation for a market clean-up remained high, yet, “expectations” didn’t materialize. And so happen the years after.

Since then, plenty of water ran under the bridge to get us where we are today. Recent market developments are truly significant and radically change the industry landscape. Year 2008 might eventually mark the greatest changes in the market since 2001. At least so far as it has been a full and exciting year of thunderous operations shutdown, bankruptcies, mergers and the advent of a new comer. This post is the first of a series of short reviews to elaborate on market structure changes in Greek telecommunications industry. Opinions and interpretations expressed here are my own alone. I’d welcome any comment or disagreement (or truth re-instament!) from you that would complement this and/or future posts.

Market Exits

podilato Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part I) Teledome was a strong telephony operator although relations with OTE never seemed to work out smoothly. OTE has blocked in the past the electronic circuits of the company due to overdue payments and only with EETT’s intervention did the re-instatement of the circuits become possible. In July 2007 Int racom Holdings had initially agreed to buy 100% shares of Teledome to merge its operations with Hellas Online and Unibrain. In November of the same year these plans were abandoned. Teledome was then preparing for an IPO. Early in 2008 OTE has once again stopped circuit services to Teledome. This time it was fo good and the company filled some time later for bankruptcy (chapter 99 of law 3588/07 – similar to the US’ Chapter 11). The debt of the company is estimated at around 20M euros the great majority of which is owned to OTE.

Lannet has been one of the most successful competitors to OTE in telephony services. Very soon, it lined up at the top of call minutes volume and revenues (at the great times of selection/preselection services). In recent years it acquired Columbia Telecom , the most successful VNO in Greece and merged with Telepassport, another operator with high telephony rankings. Especially the acquisition of Columbia marked a significant strategic advantage as in the long-term all customers of the acquired company could be taken from competition and transfered to Lannet’s network. However, Lannet has never performed well in broadband neither in unbundling business. Earlier this year OTE shutdown around 90% of the circuits that the company leased and hasn’t put them in operation ever since. October 30th (that is today), Lannet’s board of directors is in session to evaluate future actions but from the meeting’s agenda it is evident that efforts currently concentrate on saving as much financial assets of the company as possible without considering operations issues.

Altec Telecoms was the greatest bust of the year for many reasons. First, it was part of a well connected Group of Companies with almost two decades of presence in IT and Telecommunications industry (and Media earlier this decade). Second, the company was about to implement an ambitious marketing plan, high rank senior executives have been hired from the competition and according to the company’s executives plans to secure additional funding were closing to a successful end. Third, Altec Telecoms served zone 1 of ” SYZEFXIS ” project. “SYZEFXIS” is a project of Greek Ministry of the Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization, which aims at the development and updating of Public Sector’s telecom infrastructure. It’s about a core and access network for the Public Sector’s organizations aiming to satisfy all their needs for electronic communication. Zone 1 was considered le fillet of the project covering all major governmental buildings and services in the greater Athens metropolitan area. Altec Telecoms filled for bankruptcy on the 17th of October . This enabled runner-up (Hellas Online) for zone 1 of SYZEFXIS project to take in charge. (Note: after the circuits freeze by OTE and until the 17th of October fixed telephony and broadband services in ALL ministries and administration authorities was literally a joke! Public servants can now again pick up their handset and get a dial tone!).

UPDATE: Follow up the review in Part II and Part III.

share save 171 16 Greeces Telecom Market: A Reality Check (part I)

Last Week’s Picks

blogging8 Last Weeks PicksAfter announcing that is dumping its GPON business, NSN has fired against GPON at the Broadband World Forum Europe 2008 . According to company’s officials 1) VDSL technology has the qualities to directly compete with GPON and 2) by the time fiber becomes a mass market product (within a 5 years time frame) WDM-PON will be mature and cheap enough to dominate the market. At the same day, Nortel also announced its first European customer of WDM-PON products, the dutch operator UNET BV. (WDM-PON is a PON technology that multiplexes wavelengths the same way “traditional” PON technologies multiplex fibers. With WDM-PON you can get a point-to-multipoint physical layer but a point-to-point architecture at the logical layer).

If you thought that no alternative operator would object in a structural separation of incumbent’s fixed network think again, you’re wrong! Fastweb alleges that Telecom Italia’s fixed network spin-off will provide financial benefits to the incumbent alone (by tranfering some of its debts to the new company) and will hurt competition by necessitating unbundling prices increase to cover extensive costs. On the other hand, Tiscali favours Telecom Italia’s structural separation finding it to be the best way forward to keep the market open and ensure equal access to competitors.

Chinese government ordered its three domestic telecom operators China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom to share and co-build infrastructure to avoid repeat construction in the wake of industry restructuring. All three operators offer both fixed line and mobile services. The operators will be allwed 10 working days to inform on their infrastructure availability if a rival shows interest in an area that they are already present. They will also be banned from building at the same sites and routes within three years if they show no need for co-construction! It is expected that China Mobile will benefit less than its rivals. China Mobile has more than 400 million mobile phone users, more than triple that of China Unicom. China Telecom has about 43 million wireless subscribers after acquiring the CDMA assets from China Unicom.

And for those who favour alternative energy production here’s some good news. Voltree Power has developed a technology capable of harnessing the small voltage that results from the difference in PH between the tree and the ground to produce energy. The company claims to have generated sufficient electricity from the technology to power a wireless network of thousands of tiny humidity and temperature sensor nodes that can be distributed throughout forests to form an early wildfire warning system!

share save 171 16 Last Weeks Picks

Last Weekend’s Homework…

This weekend a flue has grounded me in-house, in bed or, at best, in my home office. I took advantage (go figure!) of the situation and read more than usual! While I am still recovering, here’s some of the best web readings of my last weekend:
  1. The Next Broadband Business Models: As broadband growth rates steadily decrease the new business models for broadband will not be based on new subscriber’s growth rather on existing subscriber’s ARPU (average revenue per user). Interesting piece with good ideas in Telephony Online. See also 10 Ideas for Broadband Billing from the same issue of Telephony Online.
  2. Infringement Procedures: EU documentation about the legal proceedings against any Member State that fails to comply with EU telecoms law and regulations. I had to find out a little more about it after the recent related developments against various EU countries such as Sweden, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Cyprus, Spain, Bulgaria and Romania.
  3. FTTH with European Flair: A review of the FTTH status in Europe. One of the featuring interviewees is the Fiber Ringer Benoit. Contemporary featured articles in US press give me the impression that US is starting to rethink the strong potentials of governmental involvment in NGAN development.
  4. Lighting Up Next-Gen Nets: For service providers, powering next-generation networks, particularly the outside plant, is becoming a real headache. From network design challenges to problems with improperly grounded electronics at the customer premises to pending federal and state regulatory requirements for backup power, telcos are struggling to resolve power issues quickly so that they can focus more on finding new ways to reduce energy consumption and go green.
  5. Municipalities and Open Access Critical to FTTH Growth in France: Something for all municipal broadband enthousiasts (and not only them) to have a closer look at.
  6. A new kind of muni FTTH network: An insightful discussion of the City of Powell’s business model for installing and operating a GPON (hey! better than nothing) FTTH network.


share save 171 16 Last Weekends Homework...

FTTH Global Rankings mid-2008

 FTTH Global Rankings mid 2008

(WASHINGTON, DC) – With continued regional growth in fiber to the home (FTTH) market penetration, Asia consolidated its position as the global leader in the march toward next-generation broadband while the United States and Europe also continued to experience robust growth in FTTH, according to an updated global ranking issued today by the FTTH Councils of Asia-Pacific, Europe and North America.

The ranking, updated twice a year and released today at the FTTH Council Asia-Pacific’s 3rd Annual Conference and Exhibition in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, tracks the level of FTTH market penetration in economies where more than one percent of households are connected directly into high speed fiber networks. In all, 14 economies met this threshold.

South Korea, Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan now occupy the top four positions in the ranking, and the Asian region now accounts for more than 27 million of the world’s estimated 32 million fiber to the home connections. South Korea now has nearly 37 percent of its households connected to fiber, with Hong Kong at 27 percent, Japan at 24 percent and Taiwan at 7.7 percent. And while the People’s Republic of China ranked 11th in terms of market penetration, growth in the number of connections to 7.5 million means that China is now second only to Japan in the number of households with FTTH.

“This is an exciting time for FTTH broadband in Asia. FTTH has overtaken DSL in South Korea and will soon do the same in Japan,” said Shoichi Hanatani, President of the FTTH Council Asia Pacific. “Here in the Asia-Pac region, we are witnessing the end of a hundred years of telecom history as copper loops are quickly being replaced by optical fiber access networks.”

Four Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Denmark) and Slovenia occupied the fifth through ninth positions in the ranking, with market penetration ranging from 7.5 percent to 3.2 percent. The Netherlands and Italy were in the 12th and 13th positions, each with market penetration of 1.4 percent. In all, European countries reported 1.4 million FTTH connections.

Joeri Van Bogaert, President of the FTTH Council Europe, noted that large FTTH projects now underway in France and Germany, as well as deployments in other EU countries such as Greece and Portugal, will likely affect the rankings in the near future.

“The fact that seven European countries made the global ranking, and that several rank among the top FTTH countries in the world, is a clear indication that Europe is moving forward with the adoption of next-generation broadband,” he said. “However, this positive picture does not yet represent the entire continent, which is why the FTTH Council Europe will continue to educate investors and other stakeholders and to promote accelerated deployment of FTTH networks in all European countries.”

The United States is third among the world’s economies in the total number of FTTH households at 3.3 million, and is in 10th position in the global ranking with 2.9 percent market penetration. The U.S. continues to experience the highest rate of growth of any economy in terms of FTTH subscribers – doubling the number of connections year over year. This is due largely to an aggressive FTTH deployment by market leader Verizon, Inc. and ongoing FTTH build out by more than 600 smaller providers across the country.

“Clearly, North America, and particularly the United States, has crossed the chasm and is now moving decisively toward fiber to the home as the broadband platform of choice,” said Joe Savage, President of the FTTH Council North America. “Aggressive FTTH deployment in the U.S. has created a lot of buzz about this exciting technology, and the word of mouth from early FTTH subscribers is driving growth and fueling further deployments.”

Source: FTTH Council Press Release 23/7/2008

Is it my impression or in fact Norway, very quietly, is building a strong FTTH infrastructure that expands to continuously greater population segments?

share save 171 16 FTTH Global Rankings mid 2008
Page 3 of 3123